Brownfields Reauthorization Act of 2025

(1) in paragraph (1)(I), by inserting or 501(c)(6) after section 501(c)(3);

(2) in paragraph (5)(E)(i), by striking up to 5 percent of the;

(3) in paragraph (6)(C), by striking clause (ix) and inserting the following:

(ix) The extent to which the applicant has a plan—

(I) to engage a diverse set of local groups and organizations that effectively represent the views of the local community that will be directly affected by the proposed brownfield project; and

(II) to meaningfully involve the local community described in subclause (I) in making decisions relating to the proposed brownfield project.

(4) in paragraph (10)(B)(iii)—

(A) by striking 20 percent and inserting 10 percent;

(B) by inserting the eligible entity is located in a small community or disadvantaged area (as those terms are defined in section 128(a)(1)(B)(iv)) or after unless; and

(C) by inserting, in which case the Administrator shall waive the matching share requirement under this clause before; and; and

(5) in paragraph (13), by striking 2019 through 2023 and inserting 2025 through 2030.

(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking or enhance and inserting, enhance, or implement; and

(2) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection—

(A) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2025;

(B) $55,000,000 for fiscal year 2026;

(C) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2027;

(D) $65,000,000 for fiscal year 2028;

(E) $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2029; and

(F) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2030.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the Administrator) shall submit to Congress a report that evaluates the application ranking criteria and approval process for grants and loans under section 104(k) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9604(k)), which shall include, with respect to those grants and loans—

(1) an evaluation of the shortcomings in the existing application requirements that are a recurring source of confusion for potential recipients of those grants or loans;

(2) an identification of the most common sources of point deductions on application reviews;

(3) strategies to incentivize the submission of applications from small communities and disadvantaged areas (as those terms are defined in section 128(a)(1)(B)(iv) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 9628(a)(1)(B)(iv)); and

(4) recommendations, if any, to Congress on suggested legislative changes to the ranking criteria that would achieve the goal of streamlining the application process for small communities and disadvantaged areas (as so defined).

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update the guidance relating to the application ranking criteria and approval process for grants and loans under section 104(k) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9604(k)) to reduce the complexity of the application process while ensuring competitive integrity.

(1) in subparagraph (G), by striking other than in Alaska; and

(2) by striking subparagraph (H) and inserting the following:

(H) a Regional Corporation or a Village Corporation (as those terms are defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602));