Section 1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Tech Safety for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking Act.
Section 2. Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1) In the United States, 41 percent of women and 26 percent of men experience some form of sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking, or a combination thereof, by an intimate partner.
(2) Many victims of intimate partner violence also experience nonphysical forms of abuse.
(3) With the proliferation of digital technology, technological abuse has become increasingly prevalent and pervasive among victims of intimate partner violence.
(4) According to a 2021 study by the National Network to End Domestic Violence, 97 percent of the programs providing support to victims of intimate partner violence have indicated that abusers are making use of technology to stalk, harass, or control victims.
(5) In the United States, 1 in 3 women under the age of 35 report being sexually harassed online, and over half of LGBTQ+ individuals report being the target of online abuse based on their sexual orientation or gender.
(6) Of victims who are stalked using technology—
(A) 67 percent received unwanted phone calls, voice messages, or text messages;
(B) 50 percent received unwanted emails or messages via the internet;
(C) about 35 percent said their activities were monitored using social media;
(D) 27 percent experienced the offender posting or threatening to post inappropriate, unwanted, or personal information about them on the internet; and
(E) 19 percent said the offender spied on them or monitored their activities using technologies such as listening devices, cameras, or computer or cellphone monitoring software.
(7) Technological abuse runs the gamut of technical sophistication, from the most basic social media platforms and phone-based apps to specialty stalkerware apps, demonstrating that technological abuse does not require huge financial resources or complex knowledge of technology.
(8) Rapid advances in the technology and methods for technological abuse present challenges for advocates seeking to advise victims and prevent technological abuse.
(9) The integration of trained technology experts into survivor support networks has been successful in preventing and shielding survivors from technological abuse.
Section 3. Definitions
In this Act:
(1) Director
The term Director means the Director of the Office on Violence Against Women.
(2) Eligible consortium
The term eligible consortium means an association—
(A) between—
(I) 1 or more institutions of higher education that offers a masters, doctoral, or vocational program in information technology, cybersecurity, computer science, or other similar technological discipline; or
(II) 1 or more private or public sector partners in the community with a technical workforce and a plan for recruiting technologists or volunteers to work alongside a victim service provider (as defined in section 40002(a) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12291(a))); and
(ii) 1 or more public or private domestic violence or sexual violence centers; and
(B) which has a letter of support from the local, State, Tribal, or territorial government with jurisdiction over the area in which the activities to combat technological abuse will be implemented.
(3) Institution of higher education
The term institution of higher education has the meaning given that term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).
(4) Pilot program
The term pilot program means the pilot program established under section 4(a)(1).
(5) Technological abuse
The term technological abuse has the meaning given the term in section 40002(a)(40) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(40)).
(b) Use of grant funds
A recipient of a grant under this section may use the amounts received under the grant to combat technological abuse, including for—
(1) the purchase of new technological devices for victims and survivors of technological abuse; and
(2) any other use, including the provision of victim services, that will reduce technological abuse or assist victims and survivors of technological abuse.
(1) During pilot program
Not later than 3 years after the date of the first award under the pilot program, the Director shall submit to each committee of Congress with jurisdiction of the activities carried out under the pilot program a report—
(A) reviewing the efficacy of the pilot program;
(B) indicating challenges to implementation and possible solutions; and
(C) including a recommendation relating to whether the pilot program should be turned into a permanent program.
(2) After pilot program termination
Not later than 1 year after the date on which the pilot program terminates under subsection (a)(5), the Director shall submit to each committee of Congress with jurisdiction of the activities carried out under the pilot program a report reviewing the efficacy of the pilot program, including best practices and improvements needed to combat technological abuse.
(b) Multiple grants
A recipient of a grant under section 4 is not barred from receiving a grant under this section.
(c) Use of grant funds
A nonprofit organization or institution of higher education shall use the amounts received under a grant under this section to develop tools, curricula, and other materials.
(1) Maximum amount
The Director may award a total of not more than $20,000,000 in grants under this section.
(2) Period of grants
The Director shall award grants under this section for a period of 5 years.